Outpatient Surgery Magazine - Subscribers

What's the Harm? - December 2015 - Outpatient Surgery Magazine

Outpatient Surgery Magazine, providing current information on Surgical Services, Surgical Facility Administration, Outpatient Surgery News and Trends, OR Excellence and more.

Issue link: http://outpatientsurgery.uberflip.com/i/611424

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 30 of 150

3 1 D E C E M B E R 2 0 1 5 | O U T P AT I E N T S U R G E R Y M A G A Z I N E O N L I N E return on investment after 8 months. Boulder Community Hospital in Colorado spent $150,000 on rigid sterilization con- tainers in 2003 and by 2005 had reduced its annual blue wrap pur- chase expenses from $250,000 to $60,000 — less than a 2-year pay- back. Additionally, the hospital substituted peel pouches for blue wrap in preparing sterile towel packs, which were the most frequently sterilized items. To date, the hospital has saved over $1 million in avoided supply costs. 7. Go direct-to-drain for fluid waste Fluid waste management systems dramatically reduce RMW and the risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens. Automatically discharging fluid waste directly into the sewer system in compli- ance with local and state regulations can replace the need for dis- posable plastic suction canisters and chemical solidifiers. In 2010, the technology let Bronson Methodist Hospital in Kalamazoo, Mich., avoid generating 8 tons of RMW and reduce the volume of plastic suction canisters purchased for a savings of $7,200. St. Mary's Hospital Medical Center in Green Bay, Wis., implemented a fluid management system in 2007 that reduces its regulated med- ical waste by 5,400 pounds each year for an annual savings of more z HARD EVIDENCE Sterilization containers eliminate the need to purchase and dispose of blue wrap.

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Outpatient Surgery Magazine - Subscribers - What's the Harm? - December 2015 - Outpatient Surgery Magazine