Outpatient Surgery Magazine - Subscribers

Say Yes to Total Hips - March 2014 - Outpatient Surgery Magazine

Outpatient Surgery Magazine, providing current information on Surgical Services, Surgical Facility Administration, Outpatient Surgery News and Trends, OR Excellence and more.

Issue link: http://outpatientsurgery.uberflip.com/i/272944

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 27 of 146

LEGAL UPDATE 2 8 O U T P AT I E N T S U R G E R Y M A G A Z I N E O N L I N E | M A R C H 2 0 1 4 Safe or slippery? Let's consider another situation. Brownfields Surgery Center has been contracting with Sleepytime Anesthesia for 5 years. But the Brownfields physician-owners have decided they want to capture a piece of the anesthesia fees that arise from their referrals, and don't renew Sleepytime's exclusive contract. Instead, they enter into one with Brownfields Anesthesia, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the ASC. So now when a patient undergoes a procedure at Brownfields Surgery Center, the surgeons bill for their professional services, the ASC bills for the facility fee (the profit from which finds its way back to the physician- owners as distributions) and Brownfields Anesthesia bills for services rendered (the profit from which also finds its way into physician-owners' pockets, also as distributions from the ASC). Of those 3 cash flows, the third — from Brownfields Anesthesia by way of Brownfields Surgery Center — is both problematic and a com- plicating factor. Here's why. First, there's no regulatory exception or "safe harbor" from the Anti- Kickback Statute that covers anesthesia profits returning to physi- cians as a result of their referrals. This doesn't necessarily constitute a violation of the statute. But the danger for the surgeons in our exam- ple is that their anesthesia profits will vary with the volume and value of their referrals, which is a significant red flag. Second, including anesthesia profits in the distributions that physi- cian-owners receive through the surgery center essentially demolishes the safe harbor upon which they rely for their investment in the cen- ter itself. The statute's ASC safe harbor protects returns on invest- ments only in connection with Medicare-certified ASCs, which it defines as operating exclusively for the purpose of providing surgical services. In this view, anesthesia services are not considered surgical services. OSE_1403_part1_Layout 1 3/5/14 11:29 AM Page 28

Articles in this issue

view archives of Outpatient Surgery Magazine - Subscribers - Say Yes to Total Hips - March 2014 - Outpatient Surgery Magazine