Outpatient Surgery Magazine

Special Outpatient Surgery Edition - Orthopedics - August 2017

Outpatient Surgery Magazine, providing current information on Surgical Services, Surgical Facility Administration, Outpatient Surgery News and Trends, OR Excellence and more.

Issue link: http://outpatientsurgery.uberflip.com/i/854191

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 31 of 78

3 2 S U P P L E M E N T T O O U T P A T I E N T S U R G E R Y M A G A Z I N E A U G U S T 2 0 1 7 Reproducible results Of the robot's many advantages, its greatest might be the ability to achieve reproducible results and all but eliminate variation in patient outcomes. In "Robots in Orthopaedic Surgery: Past, Present, and Future," William L. Bargar, MD, of the Sutter Joint Replacement Center, University of California–Davis School of Medicine in Sacramento, Calif., says, "Just as the industrial revolution standardized production methods and controlled quality, so can the use of robotics allow the surgeon to obtain accuracy and reproducibility to control quality and eliminate variation of outcomes." Dr. Ortiguera offers to use the robotic arm on every knee replacement patient, but finds it's especially helpful to achieve reproducible implant positions from one partial knee replacement to the next. "There's a higher failure rate in partial replacements than in full replacements, in large part because the results are very dependent on proper implant place- ment and proper knee alignment," says Dr. Ortiguera. "It's very important for us to balance the soft tissues of the ligament that support the knee and we have a hard time doing that without robotic technology." Dr. Ortiguera has been using the robot for partial knees since 2010. A couple months ago, Mayo Jacksonville added robot-assisted total knee arthroplasties. In the first 5 weeks, he's done about 20. The robot adds about 15% to 20% more time to a knee arthroplasty, according to Dr. Ortiguera, much of it spent on inserting pins in the tibia and femur to transmit data back to the computer in order to determine optimal alignment of the implant, based on how the joint moves. "It will slow you down a bit, but you're providing a better product to the patient," he says. Unmatched accuracy is your reward for longer cases. Studies have shown that robotic arm assistance is more accurate than manual techniques. Take bone milling, for example. A robot is 4 times more accurate in preparing the bone than a surgeon sawing the bone surfaces by hand. "If I asked you to saw a straight line on a piece of wood by hand and com-

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Outpatient Surgery Magazine - Special Outpatient Surgery Edition - Orthopedics - August 2017