Outpatient Surgery Magazine

No Guarantees - March 2017 - Subscribe to Outpatient Surgery Magazine

Outpatient Surgery Magazine, providing current information on Surgical Services, Surgical Facility Administration, Outpatient Surgery News and Trends, OR Excellence and more.

Issue link: http://outpatientsurgery.uberflip.com/i/798078

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 85 of 138

sponges affixed with 2D matrix labels or wands that locate sponges by radiofrequency identification — supplement the manual counting process. They offer such potential benefits as timelier counts, improved count accuracy and less usage of post-op imaging to locate missing items. Have your entire surgical team assess each technology option to see which one would effectively augment their counting practices. 8 6 • O U T PA T I E N T S U R G E R Y M A G A Z I N E • M A R C H 2 0 1 7 A 2007 study from Brigham & Women's Hospital in Boston found that counts are off in 1 out of every 8 surgeries. In none of the cases was an item left in a patient's body, but that's still a surprisingly high number. Here's how to respond when there's a discrepancy between the initial and closing counts. • Communicate. The circulating nurse or scrub tech must immediately notify the rest of the team by identifying the type and number of items that are unaccounted for. They should receive verbal confirmation from the surgeon that he understands items are missing. • Suspend wound closure. The surgeon suspends wound closure and performs another methodical wound exploration while the anesthesia provider coordinates the patient's emergence (if possi- • ALL HANDS ON DECK Each surgical team member should help to resolve count discrepancies. WHEN COUNTS ARE OFF In the Event of a Surgical Count Discrepancy ... AORN

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Outpatient Surgery Magazine - No Guarantees - March 2017 - Subscribe to Outpatient Surgery Magazine