Outpatient Surgery Magazine

Manager's Guide to Staff & Patient Safety - October 2016

Outpatient Surgery Magazine, providing current information on Surgical Services, Surgical Facility Administration, Outpatient Surgery News and Trends, OR Excellence and more.

Issue link: http://outpatientsurgery.uberflip.com/i/731766

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 51 of 62

5 2 S U P P L E M E N T T O O U T P A T I E N T S U R G E R Y M A G A Z I N E O C T O B E R 2 0 1 6 ed using bar codes," says Dr. Regenbogen. But it's just one component, he points out: "Unfortunately, it doesn't prevent us from leaving some other instrument in." Beyond the bar code Your count is off, and you think your worst fears may be coming true. You may have closed the incision with some sort of object still inside the patient. Now what? "According to the literature, you find missing sponges about half the time on X- rays," says Theodore Marentis, MD, MSEE, a radiologist at Dignity Health in Sacramento, Calif. "With our computer-aided (Kalyspo) system, we've had 5 radiol- ogists look at hundreds of images (using cadavers) and they find sponges 99.3% of time. In other words, basically always." The Kalyspo system (osmag.net/qgtx2d) — invented by Dr. Marentis — is a computer-aided detection system that's expected to be commercially available in the next year or two. It relies on proprietary software and a tag that's about the size of a baby aspirin. The tag is designed to maintain its shape and stay clearly visible on X-rays, no matter what contortions or shapes the missing item assumes, or how well concealed it is. Initially developed in the University of Michigan radiology and mechanical engineering departments, the software, says Dr. Marentis, will also help detect items that are too small to tag. The system, which would add about $30 in costs to a typical case, is likely to con- vey its greatest value both when objects are unaccounted for, and in what are known to be high-risk cases for smaller objects to be left behind. Those, he says, include patients with higher BMIs, cases that last longer than 4 hours and involve 2 surgical teams, and trauma cases. The idea is to augment barcode scanning and counting with X-rays that provide much more reliable detection, when needed. Dr. Marentis calls it a "fail-safe" approach. "It's like an airbag," he says. "What we're using now is an airbag that deploys only half the time." OSM

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Outpatient Surgery Magazine - Manager's Guide to Staff & Patient Safety - October 2016