Outpatient Surgery Magazine

The Trouble With Transvaginal Mesh - August 2016 - Subscribe to Outpatient Surgery Magazine

Outpatient Surgery Magazine, providing current information on Surgical Services, Surgical Facility Administration, Outpatient Surgery News and Trends, OR Excellence and more.

Issue link: http://outpatientsurgery.uberflip.com/i/713724

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 40 of 128

about what we did in the past and what kinds of problems there were. They're quick to scold us for using mesh, but in my hands, these prod- ucts have done very well. Yes, we have complications, but there's not an incontinence operation that's ever been done that doesn't have (the potential for) complications." There's less confidence overall about the efficacy of treating pro- lapse with mesh, however. "I have definitely reduced my use of mesh for those purposes," says Dr. Lyons. "We shouldn't be using mesh for every single patient who has pro- lapse," says Dr. Feagins. "But when it's used correctly, and appropriate tissue planes are found, and the product is placed where it's supposed to be placed, it's basically a great product, and it helps people who have very, very bad prolapse situations." A lawyer's delight Many women have been helped, but many have been hurt, too. And attorneys have picked up the scent of deep-pocketed device A U G U S T 2 0 1 6 • O U T PA T I E N TS U R G E R Y. N E T • 4 1 • PRODUCT PLACEMENT Urologist Brian A. Feagins, MD, (right) says vaginal mesh isn't to blame — it's doctors who mistakenly place it. "Mesh doesn't erode into the bladder, it doesn't erode into the urethra. It was placed there in the first place and the doctor just didn't know it," he says. Vicki Schultz, RN, CASC

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Outpatient Surgery Magazine - The Trouble With Transvaginal Mesh - August 2016 - Subscribe to Outpatient Surgery Magazine