Outpatient Surgery Magazine

Manager's Guide to Infection Control - May 2016

Outpatient Surgery Magazine, providing current information on Surgical Services, Surgical Facility Administration, Outpatient Surgery News and Trends, OR Excellence and more.

Issue link: http://outpatientsurgery.uberflip.com/i/670897

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 29 of 60

3 0 S U P P L E M E N T T O O U T P A T I E N T S U R G E R Y M A G A Z I N E M A Y 2 0 1 6 Center in Bloomington, Minn., feels that the proposed ban is appropriate. "There's enough scientific research that outlines the dangers of using powdered gloves, especially those also containing latex," she says. Ms. Groven notes, however, that the overall threat probably "isn't as serious as it may have been 10 or 20 years ago, simply because most organizations have stopped using powdered gloves in light of the evidence against them." Her facili- ty, she says, got rid of the gloves well before the proposed ban came about. "I've worked in several states, and I cannot remember the last time I saw a powdered glove." Ms. Roth says her facility is also phasing them out, adding that, "those who are knowledgeable of the difficulties with these gloves welcome the transition away from them." Powdered latex gloves account for a shrinking, but still significant, share of the U.S. surgical glove market, according to Cardinal Health. The company says the overall share of surgical powdered gloves sold decreased from 32% in 2008 to 20% in 2013. In a company survey, the most common reasons given by those still using powdered surgical gloves were that they had worked well in the past and that respondents hadn't seen any serious adverse effects. "The surgeons who use powdered gloves might be a hard bunch to crack and resistant to change," says Ms. Groven, "so I feel like that might be a barrier. But there are good alternatives out there. Hopefully that would help ease the pain of forced change." Physicians may notice a positive change, as well, since less-seri- ous risks from exposure to powder — including dermatitis and dry, itchy, irritat- ed skin — have also been observed. A ban, says the FDA, would also have little economic impact on glove manu- facturers, because so many viable options are on the market. Indeed, spokes- people for several leading glove manufacturers say their companies are already actively promoting powder-free gloves.

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Outpatient Surgery Magazine - Manager's Guide to Infection Control - May 2016