Outpatient Surgery Magazine

Manager's Guide to Hot Technology - April 2016

Outpatient Surgery Magazine, providing current information on Surgical Services, Surgical Facility Administration, Outpatient Surgery News and Trends, OR Excellence and more.

Issue link: http://outpatientsurgery.uberflip.com/i/662653

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 12 of 64

A P R I L 2 0 1 6 O U T P A T I E N TS U R G E R Y. N E T 1 3 Ask some experts about the benefits of robotic surgery and they might question the justifica- tion of investing in an expensive technology that doesn't significantly improve clinical out- comes, especially during this era of healthcare reform. It might be time to ignore that tired argument, says Chris Schabowsky, PhD, pro- gram manager at ECRI Institute, an independent healthcare research firm in Plymouth Meeting, Pa. He points to ECRI's recent assessment of 60 systematic review articles published in 2015 on the use of the da Vinci system during urologic, gynecologic, general and ENT procedures. ECRI researchers looked at short-term outcomes, including rates of intraoperative blood transfusions, post- op pain, adverse events, operative time, length of stay and clean margins in oncology surgery, as well as long- term outcomes, such as reoperation rates and overall survival of oncology patients. The evidence shows robotics prostatectomy can reduce intraoperative blood loss, operative time and length of stay, compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery. It also shows that the precision of robotic surgery lets surgeons perform more partial nephrectomies than radical nephrectomies. "There's well-documented evidence that partial nephrectomy maintains some function of the kidney that's resected," says Dr. Schabowsky. "That's a clear-cut advantage of robotics." Robotic general surgery is booming. In 2012, 40,000 cases were performed. That number jumped to 100,000 in 2014. However, Dr. Schabowsky says there's not enough clinical evidence to assess the technolo- gy's impact on cholecystectomy and colorectal surgery outcomes. Surgeons who perform laparoscopic gall- bladder resections might understandably wonder how the use of a robot that quadruples the time and triples the expense of the case makes good clinical and financial sense. Says Dr. Schabowsky, "That procedure in particular remains controversial." — Daniel Cook EVOLVING EVIDENCE Do Robots Improve Clinical Outcomes? • INNOVATIVE FINDINGS New clinical trials suggest robotic sur- gery may be a safer, more effective option. Florida Hospital

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Outpatient Surgery Magazine - Manager's Guide to Hot Technology - April 2016