Outpatient Surgery Magazine

Manager's Guide to Joint Replacement - January 2016

Outpatient Surgery Magazine, providing current information on Surgical Services, Surgical Facility Administration, Outpatient Surgery News and Trends, OR Excellence and more.

Issue link: http://outpatientsurgery.uberflip.com/i/625705

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 54 of 72

design, newer models more closely mimic the rolling and gliding motion of the joint. Most standard knee implants are made up of 3 components that cover different bone surfaces: • The metal femoral component curves around the lower end of the femur. • The tibial component is made up of a metal platform with a poly- ethylene cushion insert. It is attached to the top surface of the tibia. • The patellar piece is a dome-shaped implant made of polyethylene that covers the back surface of the patella and mimics the shape of the kneecap. Typically, manufacturers design these components to work as metal- on-plastic (usually cobalt-chromium or titanium with polyethylene). This provides smooth movement and minimal wear. There are cur- rently more than 150 knee implant designs on the market, so when choosing which device to use surgeons consider several key differ- ences, including: • Cruciate-retaining vs. posterior- stabilized. Cruciate-retaining implants let the surgeon preserve the patient's posterior cruciate ligament, if it's still intact. These implants have a small groove that allows for flexion of the ligament. Posterior- stabilized implants let the surgeon remove the ligament and replace it with a cam-and-post system that prevents the thighbone from sliding too far forward on the shinbone when the knee is bent. • Cemented vs. cementless. While some implants are attached using fast- curing bone cement, cementless prostheses are made of a material that attracts new bone growth to keep the device in place. Both approaches work well, though more surgeons are moving to cement- less options since they allow for a relatively easier surgery, take less time to place and — especially in younger patients — seem to be a better fit. J A N U A R Y 2 0 1 6 • O U T PA T I E N TS U R G E R Y. N E T • 5 5

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Outpatient Surgery Magazine - Manager's Guide to Joint Replacement - January 2016