Outpatient Surgery Magazine

Why Do ASCs Fail? - August 2015 - Subscribe to Outpatient Surgery Magazine

Outpatient Surgery Magazine, providing current information on Surgical Services, Surgical Facility Administration, Outpatient Surgery News and Trends, OR Excellence and more.

Issue link: http://outpatientsurgery.uberflip.com/i/553403

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 61 of 124

which included physical therapy, chiropractic and/or epidural steroid injections. If there was no improvement, they gave the patient a discogram, a diagnostic test to confirm that the disc on MRI was the cause of the pain. Only if the discogram was positive would they use the SpineWand to decompress the disc. The presenters claimed that of all the patients referred by PI attorneys with back or neck pain, only about 10% ended up being candidates for the SpineWand. They then explained how personal injury cases worked. Before the SpineWand, the only options physicians could generally offer to injured patients were conservative care or open surgery (discectomy or fusion). Open surgery wasn't appropriate for most patients; besides, most weren't willing to take that risk. On the other end, con- servative care didn't have a lot of "value," most patients didn't improve and these cases didn't settle for very much money for any of the parties involved. The SpineWand procedure fit right in the middle and allowed for better patient outcomes and for more cases to settle. They walked me through a typical case, a car accident in which the at-fault driver had a $100,000 limit on his insurance policy. In this case, if the patient was a candidate for the SpineWand procedure, the case would settle for the full $100,000, with about one-third going to the medical bills (surgeon, SpineWand, conservative care), one-third going to the attorney and one-third going to the patient. They described it as a win-win-win. The patient won because she got better and received a settlement. The surgeon won because, although he was risking not getting paid at all, when he did get paid, the payment was much higher than he would get from private insurance. In some cases, 10 to 20 times higher. Of course, I came to understand that the insurance company didn't perceive it this way. They claimed that when they precisely followed the treatment algo- rithm and a surgeon performed the procedure (not a pain specialist), on 6 2 O U T P A T I E N T S U R G E R Y M A G A Z I N E O N L I N E | A U G U S T 2 0 1 5 B r e a k i n g B a d

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Outpatient Surgery Magazine - Why Do ASCs Fail? - August 2015 - Subscribe to Outpatient Surgery Magazine